Ms. Ref. No.: EGY-D-23-01128R1
Title: Flexible renewable energy planning based on multi-step forecasting of interregional electricity supply and demand: Graph-enhanced AI approach
Energy

Dear Professor Yoo,

I am pleased to inform you that your paper "Flexible renewable energy planning based on multi-step forecasting of interregional electricity supply and demand: Graph-enhanced AI approach" has been accepted for publication in Energy.

"What happens next?

1. Our production department will create a proof of your article, which will be shared with you for approval.
2. We will send you a link to your post-acceptance online author forms. These forms include the publishing agreement for you to complete as well as confirming whether your article is to be published open access or subscription. We kindly request you complete the forms as soon as possible upon receipt of the link.

If we need any further information from you during the typesetting process, we will let you know.

For further information about the proofing process, please click this link: https://service.elsevier.com/<wbr>app/answers/detail/a_id/6007/<wbr>p/10592/supporthub/publishing/<wbr>related/ "

We appreciate and value your contribution to Energy. We regularly invite authors of recently published manuscript to participate in the peer review process. If you were not already part of the journal's reviewer pool, you have now been added to it. We look forward to your continued participation in our journal, and we hope you will consider us again for future submissions.

Include interactive data visualizations in your publication and let your readers interact and engage more closely with your research. Follow the instructions here: https://www.elsevier.com/<wbr>authors/author-services/data-<wbr>visualization to find out about available data visualization options and how to include them with your article.

Thank you very much for expressing your interest in ENERGY.

Sincerely,

Xue-Chao Wang
Managing Guest Editor
Energy

Comments to Authors:



Reviewer #1: My comments have been adequately addressed and I have no further comments.


Reviewer #2: After reviewing new version of the paper, I belive it should be accepted for pbulication as all requested corrections have been made and all ambiguities have been clarified.